• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

USA news & politics

So Trump has said he's going to sign an executive order demanding us carriers use steam for the catapults and hydraulics for the lifts, because he is convinced water nullifies magnets and that China are behind a big conspiracy to make everyone use magnets.

He also rambled about the navy being too "good looking".

Can everyone just accept the guy doesn't have a ******* clue and stop making excuses for it? Call it stupidity, call it dementia, he's not all there and frequently rambles completely incoherently. Trying to dismiss it all as a joke, 4d chess or any other bullshit simply doesn't fly.

Link?
 
Trumps pick for surgeon general us syndrome without an active medical licence who didn't complete her residency training and now promotes "wellness products" instead.

Yet the finger in the ear brigade will keep making excuses for the useless, narcissistic tangerine twat.
 
Trumps pick for surgeon general us syndrome without an active medical licence who didn't complete her residency training and now promotes "wellness products" instead.

Yet the finger in the ear brigade will keep making excuses for the useless, narcissistic tangerine twat.

This is all she is lol.

Shes a great selection for Trump, an anti establishment RFK aligned Dr who is looking to drive food and health standards in the USA.

Is she a practicing Dr, no her license lapsed last year, is she the only ever SG who wasnt a serving Dr?

If i remember correctly didnt Biden put a nurse in there temporarily, infacty wasnt Murthys work mainly in public health policy with a business management degree? And doesnt he run a company that uses social media to help clinical trials?

You see, once again, youve made a one sided argument against her, and ignored the fact this is fairly typical of a position nomination, there have been plenty SGs who have not been practising doctors, from all different medical backgrounds.

This took me 2 mins outside of reading the CNN headline, and i know i know it confirms all your thiughts on Trump, but if you rrad more neutral stances, and did a bit of research you would understand that politically aligned physicians are nominated whos views align with the government.

Means parents worked in government, in public health, she probably rubs noses with a lot of the usual suspects, and has been published and written arguments against the pharma and food industry practices, so she is not only qualified but aligned with RFK.

Im not defending her, or criticising her, but im willing to bet you didnt know anything of the other SGs before her, and wont rememver her name by tomorrow, shes just another stick in your armoury of Trump bad, sorry i should rephrase that, Trump uniquely bad.

Also wheres the link to Trumps comments on carriers etc, i cant seem to find anything
 
This is all she is lol.

Shes a great selection for Trump, an anti establishment RFK aligned Dr who is looking to drive food and health standards in the USA.

Is she a practicing Dr, no her license lapsed last year, is she the only ever SG who wasnt a serving Dr?

If i remember correctly didnt Biden put a nurse in there temporarily, infacty wasnt Murthys work mainly in public health policy with a business management degree? And doesnt he run a company that uses social media to help clinical trials?

You see, once again, youve made a one sided argument against her, and ignored the fact this is fairly typical of a position nomination, there have been plenty SGs who have not been practising doctors, from all different medical backgrounds.

This took me 2 mins outside of reading the CNN headline, and i know i know it confirms all your thiughts on Trump, but if you rrad more neutral stances, and did a bit of research you would understand that politically aligned physicians are nominated whos views align with the government.

Means parents worked in government, in public health, she probably rubs noses with a lot of the usual suspects, and has been published and written arguments against the pharma and food industry practices, so she is not only qualified but aligned with RFK.

Im not defending her, or criticising her, but im willing to bet you didnt know anything of the other SGs before her, and wont rememver her name by tomorrow, shes just another stick in your armoury of Trump bad, sorry i should rephrase that, Trump uniquely bad.

Also wheres the link to Trumps comments on carriers etc, i cant seem to find anything
Trump is uniquely bad. Your honour I present to you Exhibit A = Jan 6th and Exhibit B = He still goes on about it and continues to erode trust in the democratic process

No president has done this to this level. Faith in the trustworthyness (not word lol) of elections seems to be at an all time low. For the first time we're hearing, whether trolling or not, about a 3rd term for Trump. This is all unprecedented.

And that's before you get into the actual character of the man and his general moral compass, or lack of one.
 
Trump is uniquely bad. Your honour I present to you Exhibit A = Jan 6th and Exhibit B = He still goes on about it and continues to erode trust in the democratic process

No president has done this to this level. Faith in the trustworthyness (not word lol) of elections seems to be at an all time low. For the first time we're hearing, whether trolling or not, about a 3rd term for Trump. This is all unprecedented.

And that's before you get into the actual character of the man and his general moral compass, or lack of one.

I Cant get back the stupidity of this again lol,

I am interested in the recent quotes of 3rd term talk, up until now its all media faux outrage, but im happy to see some conclusive evidence, clearly ragey doesnt want to provide it, i cant keep asking.
 
Harry is a genius don't you know. Bow down Exile
I’d like to think that Harry thinks I genuinely care about democracy and the west in general so it’s a little bit annoying for this to just be brushed off as stupidity. Sure, disagree with me and show me why there’s nothing to be concerned about but I thought he was all about understanding where people were coming from.
 
I'd like to think that Harry thinks I genuinely care about democracy and the west in general so it's a little bit annoying for this to just be brushed off as stupidity. Sure, disagree with me and show me why there's nothing to be concerned about but I thought he was all about understanding where people were coming from.

Come on man, ive provided quotes to pretty much every 2nd term president talking about 3rd terms in this thread previously, if Trump is continually asked a question about a 3rd term, when he adresses it thats not him constantly talking about a 3rd term...

But hey, as ive asked you, and asked Ragey a number of times, show me the video of him talking about a 3rd term...

Ill happily put my hands up when im wrong, ive just seen 0 evidence of this, despite the constant hoorah about it.

Like i just said, a BBC article talking about it, showing him talking about successors in 2028 was embarrassing as it eluded to him talking about how he could get a 3rd term, the BBC are usually better than that type of jounalism.

But hey, show me the link, i think you understand if he genuinely discusses a 3rd term ill condemn it, but if hes asked about whether he could get a 3rd term via the VP route and he says no the people wouldnt stand for it, thats not him condoning a 3rd term.
 
Come on man, ive provided quotes to pretty much every 2nd term president talking about 3rd terms in this thread previously, if Trump is continually asked a question about a 3rd term, when he adresses it thats not him constantly talking about a 3rd term...

But hey, as ive asked you, and asked Ragey a number of times, show me the video of him talking about a 3rd term...

Ill happily put my hands up when im wrong, ive just seen 0 evidence of this, despite the constant hoorah about it.

Like i just said, a BBC article talking about it, showing him talking about successors in 2028 was embarrassing as it eluded to him talking about how he could get a 3rd term, the BBC are usually better than that type of jounalism.

But hey, show me the link, i think you understand if he genuinely discusses a 3rd term ill condemn it, but if hes asked about whether he could get a 3rd term via the VP route and he says no the people wouldnt stand for it, thats not him condoning a 3rd term.
I’m not bothered about the 3rd term stuff to be honest. I’ve only heard Bannon talking about it in what appears to be a serious way (but is probably trolling)

I’m much more concerned with Jan 6th and Trump generally eroding trust in the election process by constantly saying 2020 was rigged.
 
Come on man, ive provided quotes to pretty much every 2nd term president talking about 3rd terms in this thread previously, if Trump is continually asked a question about a 3rd term, when he adresses it thats not him constantly talking about a 3rd term...

But hey, as ive asked you, and asked Ragey a number of times, show me the video of him talking about a 3rd term...

Ill happily put my hands up when im wrong, ive just seen 0 evidence of this, despite the constant hoorah about it.

Like i just said, a BBC article talking about it, showing him talking about successors in 2028 was embarrassing as it eluded to him talking about how he could get a 3rd term, the BBC are usually better than that type of jounalism.

But hey, show me the link, i think you understand if he genuinely discusses a 3rd term ill condemn it, but if hes asked about whether he could get a 3rd term via the VP route and he says no the people wouldnt stand for it, thats not him condoning a 3rd term.





You haven't provided any quotes you make statements without any citations.

Want more? It's easily available but you are lazy

Too quote you "I honestly think we need the nights / weekends off from the internet, a restriction on mobile phones, and certainly no social media, but christ im an orwellian hypocrit!"

Please take your own advice
 
Judges rule Trump administration must use emergency funds to pay some SNAP benefits



It just remains to see if the orange-utan ignores the courts again.
 
Last edited:





You haven't provided any quotes you make statements without any citations.

Want more? It's easily available but you are lazy

Too quote you "I honestly think we need the nights / weekends off from the internet, a restriction on mobile phones, and certainly no social media, but christ im an orwellian hypocrit!"

Please take your own advice


You understand this is my evidence, and tgis is the BBC article referencing this video i was talking about..

If i asked you 5 times if you were attracted to children, and 5 times you responded you werent, then me writing an article claiming you were regularly, up to 5 times, discussing being attracted to children would that be fair?

Asking Trump about a 3rd term, then reporting that he constantly tempts a 3rd term is stupidiy, its not my fault you fall for this BS.
 
I'm not bothered about the 3rd term stuff to be honest. I've only heard Bannon talking about it in what appears to be a serious way (but is probably trolling)

I'm much more concerned with Jan 6th and Trump generally eroding trust in the election process by constantly saying 2020 was rigged.

1. Is Jan 6th still happening? Why would you still be concerned about a historical event?

2. How many election losers deny the election was lost, ill give you a hint, Clintons still doing it lol

As i said, Trump hasnt eroded trust in politics or elections, actually thats not right, because he has increased it, but he is the product of a loss of trust in the system and politicans, had public trust not been eroded Trumpism wouldnt be a thing, and the US would have rallied behind Clintons extension of the Obama administration wouldnt they?
 
1. Is Jan 6th still happening? Why would you still be concerned about a historical event?

2. How many election losers deny the election was lost, ill give you a hint, Clintons still doing it lol

As i said, Trump hasnt eroded trust in politics or elections, actually thats not right, because he has increased it, but he is the product of a loss of trust in the system and politicans, had public trust not been eroded Trumpism wouldnt be a thing, and the US would have rallied behind Clintons extension of the Obama administration wouldnt they?
Why would I be concerned about a historical event? Because I think it's important.

How many election losers deny an election was lost wasn't the point, it was who has denied an election result like Trump. Who, by the way, tried to rig the very election he said was rigged against him which is kinda my point.
 

Latest posts

Sponsored
UnlistMe
Back
Top