Trump now demanding an investigation into Bruce Springsteen because he dared to criticise Trump.
Anyone who still thinks Trump isn't just a dictator wannabe is deluding themselves. He's calling for Democrats who called cut his impeachment to be thrown out of Congress, law firms that represented those against him being punished, throwing out existing contracts to firms that didn't get on board with the maga agenda, threatening to suspend habeus corpus and now threatening frivolous investigations against private citizens for daring to speak out against him
On Fisheries
Recommend watching Oceans with David Attenborough highly suspect after that any decision on our own waters is hideously wrong. Need to vastly increase no-take zones.
Yup but the numbers required are ridiculous something like 33% of the Ocean which essentially all coastal areas. The solution requires a complete global rethink.From my knowledge, which is granted very limited, No fishing zones are excellent all round aren't they? Increase biodiversity, increase breeding, and spread out healthier and larger numbers to the fishing zones.
Didn't a study prove that allocated 25% no fish zones in a region would only lose like 5% of fish caught numbers (or something along those lines?
Yup but the numbers required are ridiculous something like 33% of the Ocean which essentially all coastal areas. The solution requires a complete global rethink.
The reality it is also one of the biggest things we can do to combat climate change as well.
As noted its not really anti fishing unless it's bottom trawling.
Sorry accidental laugh instead of like...
Where has Trump demanded an investigation into Springsteen, I'm not in the same Trump chambers as a lot of people on here, so might have missed this
![]()
Trump Wants Investigation Into Springsteen And Beyonce’s Endorsement Of Harris
The president continued his feud with singer Bruce Springsteen and claimed his performance at Kamala Harris’s campaign rally was a “MAJOR AND ILLEGAL CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION.”www.forbes.com
This accusation on impropriety coming from someone who just accepted a gift with millions from Qatar and who is engaging in one of the mostly openly corrupt cases of paying for favours with his businesses and the Trump crypto.
Springsteen is free to say what he wants without retribution from the federal government. The whole "freedom of speech" crowd are very silent at the prospect of the government carrying out retribution for free speech.I'd be interested in a bi partisan investigation tbh...
Embarrassingly for Harris she was busted by idiotic influencers while trying to recruit them, then she flew in hundreds all expenses paid to the DNC. I know everyone denied the millions of dollars rumours for Eminem, Beyonce, Lizzo and Co showings, but id still like some evidence either way.
Ultimately, why Sprigsteen feels the need to rant about Trump in Manchester, or London ill never know. I remember seeing U2 in 2009 I think it was in Giants stadium, Bono started banging on about some geopolitical issue so i and thousands other went to get beers and use the toilets. Never interested me.
But this is just another Trump is gonna Trump, say some stupid **** on Truth social, keep it relevant, keep those billions rolling in.
I'm more interested in the deals he's doing worth trillions to the US economy!
Springsteen is free to say what he wants without retribution from the federal government. The whole "freedom of speech" crowd are very silent at the prospect of the government carrying out retribution for free speech.
This isn't just Trump saying stupid ****, three acts against law firms for example and the cancelling if contracts were actual government acts...
So you don't think a president should face serious condemnation for very openly stating they want to illegally abuse their power?Well Trump has mentioned investigating Harris campaign spending previously hasn't he, I don't think he's telling Springsteen to shut it or he'll be investigated, he's doing his usual **** slinging, and banging on about Taylor Swift also.
Springsteen has been slating Trump since day one, I will never understand why any musician would break a concert to make political opinions lol, but I suppose he knows what his crowds want.
I think this is where the difference is though, Trump tweets or truths(?) Like he's just him, I think sometimes he forgets he's the president, and just gets into feuds hahaha it's quite endearing to his supporters.
You know my position, if thenheadlines are all pearl clutching at His latest twitter beef, then what's really going on?!
Is investigating Harris campaign spending 'illegal abuse of power'? I'm not sure of the exact legislation of that, I'm under the impression market rates have to be paid?So you don't think a president should face serious condemnation for very openly stating they want to illegally abuse their power?
Investigating when there is no evidence to suggest an investigation is needed is definitely an abuse of power and a well recognised method of intimidation, often employed by corrupt police departments. Investigations cannot be done on a whim without a prior reasonable suspicion.Is investigating Harris campaign spending 'illegal abuse of power'? I'm not sure of the exact legislation of that, I'm under the impression market rates have to be paid?
However you do make a good point, I am becoming numb to Trump's antics, giggling along reading the insults, and laughing at the hysterics of those who hate him. I'm sure I've made the argument before, and maybe I'm starting to be living proof of it that it just becomes a blur after a while.
He is an absolute bellend, he is coarse, rude and non presidential, I just don't care about those things because he doesn't represent me, and I dislike most of the people he gets into it with anyway.
As I said, I'm more concerned about handshake deals made in Qatar and Saudi...
Investigating when there is no evidence to suggest an investigation is needed is definitely an abuse of power and a well recognised method of intimidation, often employed by corrupt police departments. Investigations cannot be done on a whim without a prior reasonable suspicion.
I lost my father a good few years ago to prostate cancer, I was unfortunate to find him, in fact it was the anniversary of his death this week.![]()
Joe Biden diagnosed with prostate cancer, his office says
The disease has spread to the 82-year-old's bones but his office said the cancer could be effectively managed.www.bbc.co.uk
Oof. Lost my Grandad to it last year. **** cancer.
Not particularly as Dems were outraising Republicans a fair bit across the board, never mind the presidential race. Note Trump isn't about going after supposed mega doners or some other special interest, he's about going after public figures who opposed him.Isn't the 1.5bil in 4 months suspicious?
What about all the reports of payments, 1.8m here, 5 mill there? The reports from online influencers stating the Secret service were harassing them about Harris endorsements, flying 200 influencers in to the DNC all expenses paid, the FEC demanding greater transparency on political ads online, only to stand down on that... and crucially, what 2 or 3 days after Biden stepped down, Priorities USA, the Dem super PAC hosted hundreds of onlineninfluencers and educated them on how to design memes and videos promoting Harris? Or, maybe it's that Republicans don't want transparency, in any form, that's usually a decent red flag.