His choice of words is appalling, at best. Let's not spent time arguing on something, i hope, we all agree on.
His examples were poor, granted too.
Now, if by colonialism (wrongly used, again) he meant that under the current rules most of the times richer nations benefit at the expense of poorer ones then he is, unfortunately, correct. We can argue about 1) how much and 2) if someone in his position has the moral authority to talk about it the way he does, but his point remains.
I think Jabby and H looked more at what he was trying to say as opposed to what he actually said and they both made good points.
I wish we (forum) had a broader representation, country-wise. Besides more people from PI i would love to hear what people from say, Uruguay, Zimbabwe, Georgia, Canada and Romania have to say about this.
As i was reading i noticed how you all jumped on Impey and i couldn't help thinking about the lack of empathy in most of the posts. Everyone is guarding their own little plot of land. It's all about what benefits you and hardly ever what seems to be right/wrong.
I can understand why you criticize him and he deserved it, but very few actually granted any of his points, which i believe he has. That screams of bias.
The overwhelming majority of the post come from people who support nations who benefit from the current residency rules and, surprisingly, are attacking those who question those rules.