Not every 8's meant to be as slow as Jordan Crane you know!![]()
We like our 8s slow up here, Thomas the tank was force fed curry when he first arrived in the East Midlands as he was seen as a bit of a wip-a-snapper, went too far in my opinion...
Not every 8's meant to be as slow as Jordan Crane you know!![]()
Personally I'd love to see Robshaw and Tipuric starting together, big fan of both players and both have simply outstanding workrates. We've been harping on in Wales about starting two out and out 7s together for bloody ages, and while Robshaw isn't really seen as an out and out 7 (personally I see him as a 6.5 - and a bloody good one at that) I reckon it'd be damn effective. However a lot of this is still to be decided with Ferris, Lydiate (before injury I'd have started one of these two at 6) and Croft yet to come back from injury.
Tallshort - I do get your point about us losing to the Aussies with Warburton, however as dull said, Warburton was woefully out of form and match time in the tour down under - still baffles me why they chose not to play him against the Barbarians when he hadn't played a single minute of rugby since the 6 Nations, and he still hadn't quite got to his best when the AI's rolled around. If I remember correctly, there were a lot of calls for Tipuric to start pretty much all of those games.
How much has he played at 8? What's his ball control like at the back of the scrum? I've seen other flankers converted to 8, and their ball control at scrum time has been appalling, namely Jon Thomas and Rob McCusker. As we'd hope to be on top in the scrum, it's important to have that control at the back, so we can take full advantage.
Ferris will be fit for selection, provided he doesn't get injured again after he gets back. How long before Lydiate is expected to be back?
Do you think the Lions will try and employ the choke tackle? I know most teams do it every now and then, but trying to do it constantly has worked so effectively for Ireland, it's such a useful tactic.
It's not just for fetching, it's for all the other aspect of a game that a traditional 7 does, especially link-play. This could be decisive down under, where chances will need to be taken, and the game is likely to be played at a furious pace.
No matter what number Robshaw wears on his back, his skill-set is better suited to blindside, and that's the game he plays 90% of the time.
Lets see what happens for the rest of the 6N, Ferris and Lydiate are both due back as is Croft so all this chat might come to nothing, although it would be interesting if in Cardiff in March Messers Robshaw and Tipuric were to go head to head.....
Uhm mostly the former, although I think he's a little overrated at times (however I thought his try vs France was spectacular). How many games has he played in the last 9 months? Very few, he's basically starting from scratch after a serious injury - and there's so many form players that can fit the position. I suppose he has the experience, and Lydiate and Ferris are both coming back from injury too, but they haven't really been long term injuries. (In Ferris's case anyway)I still think he's a good player, just not starting XV quality.Ulsterrugby - Saying that because of his injury, or more a case of not rating him? Any particular reason if the latter?
Did you watch the England versus Scotland game? Robshaw spent half of it mopping up and securing possession. Link play is what he does day-in day-out at 'Quins. He's also considered one of the fittest players in the England team, spending time doing extra training with Tom Wood (the fittest). Not to mention he gets through more work than anyone else during matches; tackles and carrying.
Except for the last few years he's played at 7 for club and country...
The desperation for an 'genuine' or 'out-and-out' open-side really is a straw man. Most of the people listed as one have inferior stats to the peasant 6.5s. James Haskell got four turnovers in 35 minutes against Scotland as a blind-side playing blind-side. Heck, Wales put two 'genuine' open-sides on the pitch against Ireland, it didn't make them unstoppable or even stop them getting turned over. The idea, as well, that suddenly fielding 'genuine' open-sides makes teams much better at securing possession is fairly fatuous. England were destroyed at the breakdown against Australia because the Wallaby pack was far better, not simply because of Robshaw versus Hooper. Similarly, few would argue that Robshaw is a better open-side than McCaw, yet England certainly won the breakdown against the All Blacks two weeks later. If we want the Lions to win the breakdown it will take the whole pack performing, not just one forward playing with the sobriquet of 'genuine'. Robshaw has proven, time and time again, that he can consistently perform and get through a huge amount of work. That's what we want, isn't it?