• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

Exeter Chiefs thread

The Rugby Forum - Global Rugby Union News, Six Nations & RWC Discussion

Help Support The Rugby Forum:

Considering the chiefs have always maintained the name was after British tribal chiefs rather than native American chiefs, I think the rebrand makes sense. Logo could do with improving as people have pointed out, many assume it looks more like a Mongol than a Briton.
Mostly because of the helmet - which is a pretty standard design from bronze age up to medieval times, across virtually all (metalworking) military cultures.

I've also seen a lot of suggestions that it looks Saracen - largely due to a video game (Assassin's Creed?)
 
Considering the chiefs have always maintained the name was after British tribal chiefs rather than native American chiefs, I think the rebrand makes sense. Logo could do with improving as people have pointed out, many assume it looks more like a Mongol than a Briton.
Who has? As above, AFAIK the club's stance has always been that it's the term used to refer to a south-west team's first team. Social media hangers on may have justified it that way, but you're talking about a group of people whose number includes people who think it's witty or original to say that Wasps / Sharks, etc are demeaning those animals!
 
Considering the chiefs have always maintained the name was after British tribal chiefs rather than native American chiefs, I think the rebrand makes sense. Logo could do with improving as people have pointed out, many assume it looks more like a Mongol than a Briton.
What? Are you saying that even though their logo was a Native American “chief”…they say it had no connection the the name they chose…that they picked Chiefs for the native britons…but didn’t design a logo to match?

Sounds like the revisionist scrambling the crusaders tried, the name didnt have anything to do with the Christian knight of their logo apparently, that they chose “crusader” as in social crusader, fighting for positive change in the world….I call BS
 
From memory (they've been my 2nd club since my brother was somewhat tangentially involved as an acedmy player in the mid 90s), what was always claimed (including back in 1999 when it was pointed out how crass the iconography was) was that the Devon & Cornwall clubs typically called their 1st XV "the chiefs" as in, the bosses, through maritime traditions (claims of Celtic chieftains are pretty recent ret-con.s).

In 1999, when Exeter turned fully professional, they changed colours, started building a new ground, separated the 1st XV from the rest of the club, and rebranded to the Chiefs to keep that tradition alive. They chose iconography most easily associated with "Chief" - despite it being talked about as being crass at the time. Ultimately though, it was a little team from a little sport, half a globe away from the offended minority, so it was thought that no-one would particularly care.

Rugby has grown since then, Exeter have grown since then, and Exeter now appear on American TV screens every week. Society has also grown since then, and what was crass and a little insensitive 23 years ago, is unacceptably racist now - though that part could, and was predicted 23 years ago.

The problem has never been with the name (despite some of the straw-man arguments) but the iconography
 
Last edited:
With a pretty tough run in and Gloucester with and extra game to play to us, also a point ahead when they get the 4 points from the Wuss game its tough for the rest of the season. Also a few injuries to add to things.

Im actually worried for next season with losing
Jonny Hill
Sam Skinner
Sean Lonsdale
Sam Hidalgo-Clyne
Tom O'Flaherty

Without most of them as it stands we arnt doing the best and im not seeing the players really standing up to replace them or am overly excited by the signings, maybe Dunne who is EQP i believe and a good young talent.

Next year i think we will be in a rebuild and may even end up mid table.

Its the first time in quite a while ive been worried about next season.

What do the rest of you think?
 
Whoever they bring in I there’s a big challenge coming down the track for Baxter. His old faithfuls are slowly but surely fading away and I doubt he’ll be able to replicate what he’s done in the past - the world’s just different, players move more regularly etc. And it must be tough now for him to keep things fresh with those players who have been there a while.
 
Like all transfers all depends who comes in.

Exeter prob got a few more signings to come
But before it was a solid squad that were winning or on the up then adding players like woodburn, devoto, Waldrom who we developed in a strong system with fringe England players like LCD, Hill Simmonds ect playing well already and then when they started getting to the top of the table adding extra star dust like Hogg, Grey.

I mean atm we have vs tigers had LCD Hill Skinner Lonsdale Kirsten SHC Devoto Nowell Hogg and 4 of them we wont have next season +O'FLAHERTY And some will be with internstionals and injured of the ones here. Issue is we used to have players away and the replacements for them kept up our form but now theres a clear dip and not up to full speed when playing well.

I think Tigers will do what Chiefs have done in previous years and push on with a strong squad building on it given your mix experience and young players and potential plus injuries to come back.
 
With a pretty tough run in and Gloucester with and extra game to play to us, also a point ahead when they get the 4 points from the Wuss game its tough for the rest of the season. Also a few injuries to add to things.

Im actually worried for next season with losing
Jonny Hill
Sam Skinner
Sean Lonsdale
Sam Hidalgo-Clyne
Tom O'Flaherty

Without most of them as it stands we arnt doing the best and im not seeing the players really standing up to replace them or am overly excited by the signings, maybe Dunne who is EQP i believe and a good young talent.

Next year i think we will be in a rebuild and may even end up mid table.

Its the first time in quite a while ive been worried about next season.

What do the rest of you think?
I will admit its been a tough few months for Exeter. Unfortunately the curse of their own sucess being their downfall. However, i strongly believe Exeter and in particular Baxter raises his players potential and performance by 10-15%. Take someone like Sam Hill, unbelievable at Exeter and fairly average for Sale. Baxter will have a plan and logic behind his moves, i am sure of that.
 
I will admit its been a tough few months for Exeter. Unfortunately the curse of their own sucess being their downfall. However, i strongly believe Exeter and in particular Baxter raises his players potential and performance by 10-15%. Take someone like Sam Hill, unbelievable at Exeter and fairly average for Sale. Baxter will have a plan and logic behind his moves, i am sure of that.
Oh i do think Baxter will have a plan up his sleeve of how to improve us and new tactics, he always has done but from a squad point of view we're worse than in quite a few years next season, not bad by any means.

One rule thats hit us hard is the goal line drop out, before we would relentlessly tire teams out by hitting again and again, getting held up and going again, constant pick and goes, pen advantage tap and go knowing that if we're held up we go again. Meaning tes feared us in their 22. Hold us out for 5 min get posession and youve sapped alot of energy out of your team. Now we can risk the same tactic as we get held up and its for nothing. So weve been passing wider rather than pick and go but it hasnt been as affect
 
Oh i do think Baxter will have a plan up his sleeve of how to improve us and new tactics, he always has done but from a squad point of view we're worse than in quite a few years next season, not bad by any means.

One rule thats hit us hard is the goal line drop out, before we would relentlessly tire teams out by hitting again and again, getting held up and going again, constant pick and goes, pen advantage tap and go knowing that if we're held up we go again. Meaning tes feared us in their 22. Hold us out for 5 min get posession and youve sapped alot of energy out of your team. Now we can risk the same tactic as we get held up and its for nothing. So weve been passing wider rather than pick and go but it hasnt been as affect
I also think even before you take the field, he's got you geared up. He such a quality operator. The ability to hold you up over the line and get ball back is such a change. The big thing is that you used to get a 5m scrum and go again.... It was relentless.
 
but from a squad point of view we're worse than in quite a few years next season, not bad by any means.
To be fair - I think everyone will look at their squad and think the same.
Rugby is undergoing a covid-induced recession, the salary cap has shrunk by £1.4M and a marquee spot has disappeared. Yes, there was a moritorium 2 years ago, where most players will have signed new 2-year contracts; and those are coming due this summer.
 
Oh i do think Baxter will have a plan up his sleeve of how to improve us and new tactics, he always has done
Baxter is so hugely intertwined with Chiefs and so dominant there that he’s a huge risk for them as well as a massive asset. He’s way way beyond a coach’s normal shelf life and one day - possibly soon - he’ll inevitably run out of ideas or energy or both. When he does need replacing, Chiefs will need a damned good succession plan and possibly a ruthless streak.
 
To be fair - I think everyone will look at their squad and think the same.
Rugby is undergoing a covid-induced recession, the salary cap has shrunk by £1.4M and a marquee spot has disappeared. Yes, there was a moritorium 2 years ago, where most players will have signed new 2-year contracts; and those are coming due this summer.
I do agree with this its never going to be easy for any team going forward into next season, but to lose 3 locks as well as a winger thats been first choice and played almost every game and also to be in quite bad form its a very tough one.

But i do get your point.
 
I do agree with this its never going to be easy for any team going forward into next season, but to lose 3 locks as well as a winger thats been first choice and played almost every game and also to be in quite bad form its a very tough one.

But i do get your point.
Looks at the table...

Looks further down...

Remembers to scroll past the 12th team of 12...

Still can't find any sympathy ;)
 
There are quite a few ageing clubs stars at the chiefs that also need replacing soon as well. It does look like the next few seasons could be a minor rebuild but I would have expected some more signings being announced sometime soon for next season.
 
Times reporting that Salvi has left his position as defence coach.

In the same article it says that Baxter and Hepher have both been in place since 2009 and Hunter (forwards coach) since 2013. That’s great in so many ways, but must also be pretty stale by now. Any organisation needs a managed flow of new blood and fresh thinking.
 
Times reporting that Salvi has left his position as defence coach.

In the same article it says that Baxter and Hepher have both been in place since 2009 and Hunter (forwards coach) since 2013. That’s great in so many ways, but must also be pretty stale by now. Any organisation needs a managed flow of new blood and fresh thinking.
Ricky Pellow (skills coach) is part of the class of 2009 too. I get the point about things being stagnant, but if this is the problem, it seems strange that the slide should come all of a sudden (although you could argue that finishing runners up last year represented the beginning of a slide). Pure conjecture, but I can't help wondering how much Robin Cowling's reduced involvement with the club is what's behind the slide.
 
Piece in the Times this morning about Baxter changing role. Remaining DoR but relinquishing control of the team before and on match days.
 
Strange. Does it say whether that’s his choice or not? I know he gives a lot of ownership to Hepher and Hunter but this seems to suggest he’s giving away any real input on the day to day?

FWIW, I think Exeter have been a bit unfortunate. In the past, they’ve been able to keep a good proportion of their first choice 23 together for the majority of the season, but due to international call-ups (and Lions rest period) and injuries to key players, they’ve been a bit more exposed. They’ve only had a handful of games from LCD, Sam Simmonds, Hill, Gray, Nowell and Vermeulen and not many more from the likes of Slade Kirsten or Skinner. Often those absences have overlapped so they’ve frequently been playing at about 70% of full strength. Obviously every team is impacted by international call-ups, it’s just that Exeter’s have typically been combined with serious injuries (LCD and Hill for example).

Throw in a few more bits like the law changes and really weird dip in form from Joe Simmonds and it’s been a weird season for them in all sorts of ways.

Their signings aren’t massively eye-catching, but Dunne and O’Loughlin should be the kind of players who can immediately slot in to the match-day 23. OTOH, losing Hill, Skinner, Lonsdale and Armand all at once is going to hurt given that they’ve all featured pretty heavily in the successful era.

This might be a new era where top 6 is more the reality than top 4?
 
Strange. Does it say whether that’s his choice or not? I know he gives a lot of ownership to Hepher and Hunter but this seems to suggest he’s giving away any real input on the day to day?

FWIW, I think Exeter have been a bit unfortunate. In the past, they’ve been able to keep a good proportion of their first choice 23 together for the majority of the season, but due to international call-ups (and Lions rest period) and injuries to key players, they’ve been a bit more exposed. They’ve only had a handful of games from LCD, Sam Simmonds, Hill, Gray, Nowell and Vermeulen and not many more from the likes of Slade Kirsten or Skinner. Often those absences have overlapped so they’ve frequently been playing at about 70% of full strength. Obviously every team is impacted by international call-ups, it’s just that Exeter’s have typically been combined with serious injuries (LCD and Hill for example).

Throw in a few more bits like the law changes and really weird dip in form from Joe Simmonds and it’s been a weird season for them in all sorts of ways.

Their signings aren’t massively eye-catching, but Dunne and O’Loughlin should be the kind of players who can immediately slot in to the match-day 23. OTOH, losing Hill, Skinner, Lonsdale and Armand all at once is going to hurt given that they’ve all featured pretty heavily in the successful era.

This might be a new era where top 6 is more the reality than top 4?
70% strength? I weep for them, really, truly weep for them
 
Possibly O'Loughlin's last game for us tonight, I was very excited when he first came on to the scene and I think his career took a hit when he moved to centre for the good of the squad. He was never going to overtake Ringrose and he'd broken into Ireland squads as a wing.

He's had a few quiet seasons but is coming back to form at the right time for you lads. I'd be disappointed for him if he's not a starter next year, good enough to be comfortable challenging for playoff spots and European knockout games.
 
Sounds like Exeter have a lot more debt than expected though. Surprised that the match revenue doesn’t cover debt repayments, only as i thought Chiefs were taking home near 1m
 
I think they havnt had as good attendance this year and i guess with what they spent on Sandy park hotel plus covid loans it will all add up. I worry as some clubs are probably worse than chiefs as they wont have the same level of 'non rugby assets'

For the record i have no knowledge on any of this its just speculation.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top