England won because they played the conditions far, far better.
We can sit on here and go on about coaches all day as a means to shield the players...
But ultimately - if the Irish players didn't have the wit to adapt a territorial game when the ball is a bar of soap, then that leaves them as culpable in the defeat as the coaching team. If they didn't have the skills to execute the territorial game better than the English players, then where does that leave them?
You do the English a disservice by suggesting they somehow won despite being inferior. Better team won. End of.
[Damn that hurt.:lol:]
We can sit on here and go on about coaches all day as a means to shield the players...
But ultimately - if the Irish players didn't have the wit to adapt a territorial game when the ball is a bar of soap, then that leaves them as culpable in the defeat as the coaching team. If they didn't have the skills to execute the territorial game better than the English players, then where does that leave them?
You do the English a disservice by suggesting they somehow won despite being inferior. Better team won. End of.
[Damn that hurt.:lol:]