I would say maybe an offer in Japan came up, as I always presumed he was gonna go back there after England, but leaving 4 years early...I doubt the ARU would be happy with him just walking out for another rugby job when he's under contract
And the ARU and Australian rugby fans.Rennie must be fuming. I doubt ARU would’ve fired him and brought in Eddie if it had only been for a year.
Yeah, after commenting in this thread I went to look at the actual quote and it seems much more like a tongue-in-cheek way of biting back at his detractors than a legitimate insight into his future. Kind of “everyone says I’m a short term coach so I’ll just **** off after the RWC, shall I?”Looks like we’ve all forgotten Rule 1 of the Eddie handbook which is to ignore anything and everything he says.
It would appear the horrendous nose dive in results after a good initial period would say you’re a short term coach.
2 years of that was the team Lancaster and Farrell built. So maybe he had 2 good years but not the first twoIs 4 years that short a term?
Also outside of a good semi-final, the last couple of years of that cycle wasn't great anyway.Is 4 years that short a term?
Also outside of a good semi-final, the last couple of years of that cycle wasn't great anyway.
2016 - Grand slam + 100% win ratio
2017 - Champions + 90% win ratio
2018 - 5th + 46% win ratio (including a loss to the baabaas)
2019 - 2nd + 73% win ratio (though we played some awful rugby that year)
Post world cup
2020 - Champions + 89% win ratio
2021 - 5th + 70% win ratio
2022 - 3rd + 42% win ratio
Parts of those periods worst finish in a 6Ns, twice. Least tries scored, most tries conceded if I remember correctly. We ended up playing some of the worst rugby I've ever seen England play. Definitely would not say it was a good 4 year period.
I'm not saying it was all Lancaster and Farrell, I'm saying apart from the first two years and a good world cup, there wasn't a lot to be massively excited about.Might have played some bad rugby but how is 2nd in the 6N’s and 2nd in the RWC not great?
I like how people are now saying it was Farrell and Lancaster that built this team, what since Farrell won the grand slam are people now deciding that Farrell needs more credit for England? What about Rowntree?
And did Lancaster build it? Or was it the Prem clubs? Who gets credit cause Lancaster bottled most of the big calls come RWC time
Yeh broken 3 radio sets apparently.Looks more like standard frustration rather than pressure getting to him imo
Jones has only won 3 out his last 13 tests as a head coach, all for Eng vs a poor Japan, a whitewashed Italy and a strike distracted Wales. Not likely to improve with the ABs in town tomorrow.
No doubt that ratio will improve a bit, but everyone’s got a shelf life.
I agree with a lot of that but a couple of exceptions.I mean playing
Argentina
South Africa
Isn’t the easiest of starts
I know people like to **** on him but his record speaks for itself and he will go down in history as prob one of the best international coaches in history. I am a fan boy of his thought. I do think that when it comes to leadership he’s one of the most interesting characters in rugby and one of the few coaches I genuinely like listening to him talk be it for good or **** takes its actually interesting and not the same robotic ****.
This year with Aus will be prob a damp squid same with England.
Post RWC will be what his shelf life is judged by.
I still think Aus will come good come RWC, I also think Eddie personality wise is very much a product of coaching in two countries with prob the most ruthless sports media. That sport in England in general to succeed need to look at how the way the media reports it.