- Joined
- Apr 27, 2008
- Messages
- 100,018,503
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
I think for New Zealand it's a question of how close to first side was it last week. If you like England and don't have a bloody clue an a blindfolded squirrel aiming at a dart board has just as much chance to pick the team and players positions you have to bed that first side.Uruguay have show a bit of fire i think (more than Italy did the other day), so agreed we should win its injuries im concerned about if we're playing our top team
i think most people agree thats more or less our first string team, even Fozzie seems to have come around to clarke not being first choice...week before the QF's of the world cup seems like the right time for the coach to land on what most other people could see years agoI think for New Zealand it's a question of how close to first side was it last week. If you like England and don't have a bloody clue an a blindfolded squirrel aiming at a dart board has just as much chance to pick the team and players positions you have to bed that first side.
Otherwise they probably be better off resting key players before a rested SA or Ireland.
France's schedule required some risk NZs doesn't.
Not really. They made a choice between bringing in blackadder (who hasn't played for two years due to injury), bringing in finau (who wasn't ready prior to this year, so has had limited time), and akira is injured, sotutu isn't as versatile. Seems like they built pretty much bang on the right amount of depth there to me. Any more and the players they have wouldn't have had as much experience. If you wanted to be critical you might say they should have realised earlier that akira wasn't their preference, but look at the reality of that and you'll see akira was getting picked when playing well. Plus, a change in forward coach is bound to change preferences. But that wouldn't have changed who they selected now - because akira is injured.just saw its nearly two years since blackadder played a test...our squad prep has been SO BAD that one injury has resulted in having to take a guy that hasn't played a test in 2 years...thats what fozzie has done to the depth of test hardened players in NZ
Apart from people coming off the bench as they were coming back from injury, and de groot being suspended, that was the top side. We might hope for some changes like taukeiaho and replacing beauden with faingaanuku (jordan going to fullback) but we don't think it will happenI think for New Zealand it's a question of how close to first side was it last week. If you like England and don't have a bloody clue an a blindfolded squirrel aiming at a dart board has just as much chance to pick the team and players positions you have to bed that first side.
Otherwise they probably be better off resting key players before a rested SA or Ireland.
France's schedule required some risk NZs doesn't.
would love to see it but agreed it is really not likely... replacing beauden with faingaanuku (jordan going to fullback) but we don't think it will happen
that's nothing to do with depth, that's them deciding that it's ok to play someone who hasn't played in two years.not with ya, i feel as our first alternate they should be more recently involved that 2 years ago, we're not talking about 2011 where we had 4 injuries to first fives, this is the 6th best loosie in the country
doesn't it go hand in hand? they feel injury prone blackadder who last played a test 2 years ago (and even then didn;t really step up) is a viable option because other options are thin on the ground?that's nothing to do with depth, that's them deciding that it's ok to play someone who hasn't played in two years.
And we won in 2015 with less depth than we have now
My point is it's not because they haven't built depth. They just think he is the best option despite them having built depth. Effectively you have finau, akira and sotutu who have been developed, plus the 6 there now, and scooter. So 10 loosies. That seems like enough to me. asking for more than that and you would be seriously compromising the ability to build combinations. Also, blackadder has spent time with the team while injured as I understand. You could add vaai but he hasn't played much in the loose.doesn't it go hand in hand? they feel injury prone blackadder who last played a test 2 years ago (and even then didn;t really step up) is a viable option because other options are thin on the ground?
but 2015 was stacked with battled hardened "greats"...the depth isn't as important when every jersey is OWNED by at least a couple of guys fighting it out....currently we're one injury from open trials
kind of feel you're making my point, very few are stand out options and by now i would have expected a fairly clear who the next cab off the rank is and it wouldn't be someone who hasn't played a test in 2 years and even when he did didn't set the world on fire. i mean Akira hasn't played since RC last year...same with sotutu i thinkMy point is it's not because they haven't built depth. They just think he is the best option despite them having built depth. Effectively you have finau, akira and sotutu who have been developed, plus the 6 there now, and scooter. So 10 loosies. That seems like enough to me. asking for more than that and you would be seriously compromising the ability to build combinations. Also, blackadder has spent time with the team while injured as I understand. You could add vaai but he hasn't played much in the loose.
Yeah, well, they obviously rate him. Hope they're right. He was definitely the standout super rugby forward when he made the all blacks but you are right he didn't particularly perform at test level.kind of feel you're making my point, very few are stand out options and by now i would have expected a fairly clear who the next cab off the rank is and it wouldn't be someone who hasn't played a test in 2 years and even when he did didn't set the world on fire. i mean Akira hasn't played since RC last year...same with sotutu i think